UAP Hearings & The Unending Need for Solid Data
Categories:
Logan. So, there was another Congressional hearing on UAP back in May 2023. Listened in. You know what the recurring theme was? Data. Or more accurately, the lack of good, consistent, verifiable data. It’s a drum I’ve been beating for years, and it’s a big part of why we’re building the Phenom App. I even hit on this when I chatted with Joe Rogan on JRE #2264.
When you hear folks testifying, experts talking, it always comes back to this: anecdotal accounts, fuzzy videos, data captured without any kind of standard – it’s tough to build real understanding on that. If we’re going to get anywhere with this UAP enigma, we have to up our game on data quality. Period.
That’s where Phenom comes in. We’re designing it to be a serious tool. When you log something, it’s not just a note. It’s timestamps, it’s geolocation. We’re working on integrating sensor data – magnetometer, accelerometer, whatever the device can reliably provide. Context is king.
This isn’t a new problem. Think back to the Condon Committee report in ‘68. One of their big struggles? The mixed bag of witness reports, the lack of solid physical evidence. Technology’s come a long way, no doubt. But the core need for reliable, structured data capture? That hasn’t changed one bit.
The way I see it, the more people we can equip with the right tools to document what they’re seeing – in detail, in a way that can be cross-referenced and analyzed – the better our chances of cutting through the noise. The ongoing NASA UAP study is pushing for a scientific approach too, and that’s the right direction. We’re here to support that by empowering citizen observers.
Keep looking up, and log it right.
Logan